Comparative philosophical analysis of the rational ethics of I. Kant and the spiritual and moral values of Confucianism

Authors

  • Nazgul Kudaibergenova Al-Farabi Kazakh National University
  • Zhamilya Amirkulova Al-Farabi Kazakh National University
  • Tauyekel Ospanov Satbayev University
  • Zhadyra Omirbekova Al-Farabi Kazakh National University
  • Zhandos Kumganbayev Al-Farabi Kazakh National University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24204/ejpr.2022.3781

Keywords:

Kant studies, Confucius, spiritual and moral values, history of religions, philosophical system, moral norms

Abstract

Nowadays,  there  is  a  growing  interest  in  the  study  of  various  philosophical  concepts.  One  of  the  relevant  topics  is  the  mutual  influence  or antagonism of Eastern and Western teachings about ethics and morality. One  of  the  insufficiently  studied  problems  is  the  mutual  influences  of  I.  Kant’s ideas and Confucius’ teachings. The goal of the study is to analyse the rational ethics of I. Kant and the spiritual and moral values of Confucianism within the comparative philosophical perspective, to consider their common and distinctive features. The novelty of this study is an integrated approach and a detailed approach to the study of the outlined problems. In this study, the directions for further research were outlined, which deal with a deeper analysis  of  certain  aspects  of  the  teachings  of  I.  Kant  and  Confucius.  The  materials and conclusions can be used for the preparation of various courses.

References

Ali, Forkan. 2020. “Connecting east and west through modern Confucian thought: Re-reading 20th century Taiwanese philosophy”. Asian Studies 8, no. 3: 63–87. doi:10.4312/as.2020.8.3

Bazarova, Anna. 2009. “Confucian values and moral education in the Chinese education system”. Bulletin of the Buryat State Univ.. Pedagogy. Philology. Philosophy 8: 17–19.

Burnell, Abram, Vera Pozsgay, and Iryna Kravets. 2021. “Corporate culture in preschool organisation administration: European and Asian context”. Scientific Bulletin of Mukachevo State Univ.. Series “Pedagogy and Psychology” 7, no. 3: 62–69. doi:10.52534/msu-pp.7(3).2021.62–70

Canning, Una. 2019. “Public health ethics: A flawed view of Kant’s argument from autonomy”. Journal of Public Health 42, no. 4: e477–e481. doi:10.1093/pubmed/fdz164

Caranti, Luigi. 2018. “Replies: Autonomy and human dignity. A reassessment of Kant’s political legacy. Human rights, peace, progress”. Filozofija i Drustvo, 29, no. 4: 598–612. doi:10.2298/FID1804598C

Chorny, Victor. 2020. “Kant and the “Аwakening” from the rationalist principle of sufficient reason”. Sententiae 39, no. 2: 104–123. doi:10.31649/sent39.02

Feldhaus, Charles. 2018. “Kant and the duty of truthfulness: contrast and comparison between Essay and Lectures on Ethics Paul Menzer”. Campinas 13, no. 2: 6–17. https:// www.cle.unicamp.br/eprints/index.php/kant-e-prints/article/view/1290

Froese, Katrin. 2008. “The art of becoming human: Morality in Kant and Confucius”. Dao, 7: 257–268. doi:10.1007/s11712–008–9070–0

Frolova, Elena, and Valentina Zemenko. 2009. “Russian researchers on the principles and methods of the Confucius pedagogical school”. Bulletin of the Scientific Association of Students and Postgraduates of the Faculty of History of the Perm State Humanitarian Pedagogical Univ.. Series: Studis Historica Juvenum 1, no. 5: 112–115.

Garrath, Williams. 2007. “I. Kant’s moral philosophy: Judges in our own case: Kantian legislation and responsibility attribution”. Politics and Ethics Review 3: 8–23. doi:10.1177/1743453X0700300103

Garrath, Williams. 2012. “Between ethics and right: Kantian politics and democratic purposes”. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1468–0378.2012.00557.x

Hinske, Norbert. 2015. “Kantianism, Kantian studies and Kantophilology. Reflections on the history of the reception of Kantian thought”. Historical and Philosophical Yearbook 3: 154–173.

Holberg, Erica. 2019. “Kant as ethical naturalist: First and second natures in Kant’s ethics”. Philosophical Inquiries 7, no. 2: 111–130. doi:10.4454/philinq.v7i2.251

Ivanchenko, Nadezhda. 2014. “Features of the Confucian discourse”. Questions of Theoretical and Applied Linguistics 2: 23–28.

Khaimurzina, Marina. 2014. “Interpretation of the specifics of Confucian religion in the works of modern Confucian philosophers”. Bulletin of the Amur State Univ.. Series: Humanities 64: 19–25.

Kovalchuk, Zoriana. 2021. “Personal reflection in constant conditions social change”. Social & Legal Studios 4, no. 14: 177–183. doi:10.32518/2617–4162–2021–4-177–183

Kudaibergenova, Nazgul, Saniya Edilbay, Gulzhan Abdigalieva, and Zhandos Kumganbayev. 2015. “Confucius and Immanuel Kant: The problem of virtue and morality”. Asian Social Science 11: 105–116. doi:10.5539/ass.v11n19p211

Lu, Yinghua. 2017. “The phenomenology of respect: With special attention to Kant, Scheler, and Confucianism”. Asian Philosophy 27, no. 2: 112–126. doi:10.1080/09552367.2017.1319084

Minasyan, Larisa, and Sergey Minasyan. 2005. “Kant and modernity. Proceedings of higher educational institutions”. Social Sciences in North Caucasian Region S12: 11–17.

Nowosad, Sławomir. 2017. “Basic ethical terms of Confucianism”. Roczniki Teologizne 64, no. 3: 49–59. doi:10.18290/rt.2017.64.3–4en

Prosekov, Sergey. 1999. “Confucianism: Spiritual origin and economic prosperity”. Finance: Theory and Practice 3: 72–79.

Schafer, Karl. 2019. “Kant: Constitutivism as capacities-first philosophy”. Philosophical Explorations 22, no. 2: 177–193. doi:10.1080/13869795.2019.1599049

Skripnik, Alexey. 2008. “On the problem of lies in the ethics of I. Kant”. Philosophical and literary journal “Logos” 5, no. 68: 188–195. doi:10.1007/978–3-030–62982–3

Sticker, Martin, and Marcel Van Ackeren. 2018. “The Demandingness of Beneficence and Kant’s System of Duties”. Social Theory and Practice 44, no. 3: 405–437. doi:10.5840/soctheorpract201862142

Sticker, Martin. 2020. “Kant, eudaimonism, act-consequentialism and the fact of reason”. Archiv Fur Geschichte Der Philosophie 102, no. 2: 209–241. doi:10.1515/agph-2017–0033

Świątczak-Borowy, Martyna. 2019. “Kant and Confucius: On moral decision-making”. Studies in Global Ethics and Global Education 10: 72–91. doi:10.5840/soctheorpract201862142

Tüzer, Ahmet. 2015. “Pretending God: Critique of Kant’s Ethics”. Beytulhikme an International Journal of Philosophy 17: 137–165. doi:10.18491/bijop.07300

Ulgen, Ozlem. 2017. “Kantian ethics in the age of artificial intelligence and robotics”. Questions in International Law 43: 59–83. http://www.qil-qdi.org/2017/10/

Vovchenko, Olha. 2021. “The Influence of family upbringing on the formation of self-esteem of adolescents with developmental disabilities”. Scientific Bulletin of Mukachevo State Univ.. Series “Pedagogy and Psychology” 7, no. 4: 9–19. doi:10.52534/msu-pp.7(4).2021.9–19

Webb, Stewart. 2020. “Chapter 9 on concepts: The general and the particular”. Journal of Philosophy of Education 54, no. 6: 1629–1643.

Wenzel, Christian. 2018. “Aesthetic education in Confucius, Xunzi, and Kant”. https:// www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/yewph-2018–0006/html

Zehou, Li. 2018. “Combining Kant and Confucius”. In: The Origins of Chinese Thought, pp. 229–270. Leiden: Brill. doi:10.1163/9789004379626_010

Zuy, Michail. 2016. “Achilles’ heel of Kant’s ethics”. Bulletin of the Russian Christian Humanitarian Academy 17, no. 2: 152–162

Published

2022-12-16

How to Cite

Kudaibergenova, Nazgul, Zhamilya Amirkulova, Tauyekel Ospanov, Zhadyra Omirbekova, and Zhandos Kumganbayev. 2022. “Comparative Philosophical Analysis of the Rational Ethics of I. Kant and the Spiritual and Moral Values of Confucianism”. European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 14 (4):149–170. https://doi.org/10.24204/ejpr.2022.3781.

Issue

Section

Research Articles