Gadamer, Barth, and Transcendence in Biblical Interpretation


  • Darren Sarisky Australian Catholic University



 The essay reflects on how Hans-Georg Gadamer and Karl Barth view interpretation of the Christian Bible.  It proceeds in three main sections.  The first contends that Gadamer secularizes Christian theology, and that this has drawbacks for the sort of reading his hermeneutic can give to Christian Scripture.  The second part turns to Barth, arguing that the whole structure of his approach to the Bible factors in theological commitment, with benefits for the readings he can deliver.  The final part makes a case that contemporary reflection on interpretation can nonetheless glean important insights from Gadamer, especially regarding the readerly reception of texts, because his perspective has a certain sort of richness that Barth’s cannot match.  The overall suggestion emerging from the interrogation of these two thinkers is that phenomenology and theology might learn from one another, that they each contribute something valuable to discussions of biblical interpretation.



Aquinas, Thomas. 1964-1981. Summa Theologiae: Latin text and English translation, introductions, notes, appendices, and glossaries. 61 vols. Ed. Thomas Gilby et al. London: Blackfriars in conjunction with Eyre & Spottiswoode.

Azevedo, Ruben T., and Manos Tsakiris. 2017. “Art reception as an interoceptive embodied predictive experience”. The Behavioral and brain sciences 40: 17–18. doi:10.1017/S0140525X17001856.

Cavell, Stanley. 1969. “Knowing and Acknowledging”. In Must We Mean What We Say? A Book of Essays, edited by Stanley Cavell, 238–66. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.

Gombrich, Ernst H. 1961. Art and Illusion: A Study in the Psychology of Pictorial Representation. London: Phaidon Press.

Hick, John. 1968. “Religious Faith as Experiencing-As”. In Royal Institute of Philosophy Lectures: Talk of God, edited by G. N. A. Vesey, 20–35. London: Macmillan.

Kant, Immanuel. 1998. Critique of Pure Reason. Ed. Paul Guyer and Allen W. Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Koelsch, Stefan, Peter Vuust, and Karl Friston. 2019. “Predictive Processes and the Peculiar Case of Music”. Trends in cognitive sciences 23, no. 1: 63–77. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2018.10.006.

Maritain, Jacques. 1946. Art and Scholasticism with Other Essays (The Frontiers of Poetry). London: Sheed & Ward.

Rilke, Rainer M. 2009. “The First Elegy”. In The Duino Elegies & The Sonnets to Orpheus: A Dual Language Edition, edited by Rainer M. Rilke, 3–11. New York: Vintage International.

Schjødt, Uffe. “Predictive coding in the study of religion”. Supplements to Method & Theory in the Study of Religion 2019, no. 13: 364–79.

Schjødt, Uffe, and Marc Andersen. 2017. “How does religious experience work in predictive minds?”. Religion, Brain & Behavior 7, no. 4: 320–23. doi:10.1080/2153599X.2016.1249913.

Scruton, Roger. 2012. The Face of God: The Gifford Lectures. London: Bloomsbury Academic.

van de Cruys, Sander, Claudia Damiano, Yannick Boddez, Magdalena Król, Lore Goetschalckx, and Johan Wagemans. 2021. “Visual affects: Linking curiosity, Aha-Erlebnis, and memory through information gain”. Cognition 212: 1046–98. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104698.

van de Cruys, Sander, and Johan Wagemans. 2011. “Putting reward in art: A tentative prediction error account of visual art”. i-Perception 2, no. 9: 1035–62. doi:10.1068/i0466aap.

van Elk, Michiel, and André Aleman. 2017. “Brain mechanisms in religion and spirituality: An integrative predictive processing framework”. Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews 73: 359–78. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.12.031.

Williams, Rowan. 1977. “Poetic and Religious Imagination”. Theology 80, no. 675: 178–87. doi:10.1177/0040571X7708000305.

Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1953. Philosophical Investigations / Philosophische Untersuchungen. Tr. G. E. M. Anscombe. Oxford: Blackwell.

Wolf, Judith. forthcoming 2022. Inspiration and Imagination: Modern Theology.

Wolfe, Judith. forthcoming 2022. “The End of Images: Towards a Phenomenology of Eschatological Expectation”. In Image as Theology: Arts and the Sacred 5, edited by Mark McInroy, Casey Strine and Alexis Torrance. Turnhout: Brepols.

Zamir, Tzachi. 2006. Double Vision: Moral Philosophy and Shakespearean Drama. Princeton, N.J: Princeton Univ. Press.



How to Cite

Sarisky, Darren. 2021. “Gadamer, Barth, and Transcendence in Biblical Interpretation”. European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 13 (4).



Research Articles