Is Theism Compatible With Moral Error Theory?

Authors

  • St.John Lambert University of Southampton

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24204/ejpr.2022.3485

Keywords:

theism, moral error theory, divine goodness, perfect being theology, moral properties

Abstract

This paper considers whether theism is compatible with moral error theory. This issue is neglected, perhaps because it is widely assumed that these views are incompatible. I argue that this is mistaken. In so doing, I articulate the best argument for thinking that theism and moral error theory are incompatible. According to it, these views are incompatible because theism entails that God is morally good, and moral error theory entails that God is not. I reject this argument. Since it is the best argument for thinking that theism and moral error theory are incompatible, I conclude that these views are compatible: one can coherently accept both views.

References

Adams, Robert Merrihew. 1973. “A Modified Divine Command Theory Of Ethical Wrongness”. In Religion and Morality, edited by Gene Outka and John Reeder, 318–47. New York: Anchor.

— . 1979. “Divine Command Metaethics Modified Again”. Journal of Religious Ethics 7, no. 1: 66–79.

— . 1979. “Moral Arguments For Theistic Belief”. In Rationality and Religious Belief, edited by C. F. Delaney, 116–40. Notre Dame: Univ. of Notre Dame Press.

— . 1999. Finite and Infinite Goods: A Framework for Ethics. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.

Baggett, David, and Jerry L. Walls. 2011. Good God: The Theistic Foundations of Morality. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.

— . 2016. God and Cosmos: Moral Truth and Human Meaning. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.

Copan, Paul. 2003. “The Moral Argument”. In The Rationality of Theism, edited by Paul Copan and Paul K. Moser, 149–74. London: Routledge.

Craig, William Lane. 2003. “A Reply to Objections”. In Does God Exist? The Craig–Flew Debate, edited by Stan W. Wallace, 155–88. Aldershot: Ashgate.

— . 2008. Reasonable Faith. Wheaton: Crossway.

— . 2009. “This Most Gruesome of Guests”. In Is Goodness Without God Good Enough?, edited by Robert K. Garcia and Nathan L. King, 167–88. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.

Dreier, James. 2019. “Is There a Supervenience Problem for Robust Moral Realism?” Philosophical Studies 176: 1391–1408. doi:10.1007/s11098–019–01244-w.

Evans, C. Stephen. 2013. God and Moral Obligation. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.

Hare, John. 2015. God’s Command. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.

Linville, Mark D. 2009. “The Moral Argument”. In The Blackwell Companion to Natural Theology, edited by William Lane Craig and J. P. Moreland, 391–448. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

Mavrodes, George. 1986. “Religion and the Queerness of Morality”. In Rationality, Religious Belief, and Moral Commitment: New Essays in the Philosophy of Religion, edited by William J. Wainwright and Robert Audi, 213–26. Ithaca: Cornell Univ. Press.

Morris, Thomas. 1987. “Perfect Being Theology”. Noûs 21, no. 1: 19–30.

Murphy, Mark C. 2002. An Essay on Divine Authority. Ithaca: Cornell Univ. Press.

Olson, Jonas. 2014. Moral Error Theory: History, Critique, Defence. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.

Oppy, Graham. 1992. “Is God Good by Definition?” Religious Studies 28, no. 4: 467–74. doi:10.1017/S0034412500021867.

Quinn, Philip L. 1978. Divine Commands and Moral Requirements. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.

Rachels, James. 1971. “God and Human Attitudes”. Religious Studies 7, no. 4: 325–37. doi:10.1017/S0034412500000391.

Rosen, Gideon. 2020. “What Is Normative Necessity?” In Metaphysics, Meaning, and Modality: Themes from Kit Fine, edited by Mircea Dumitru, 205–33. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.

Rowe, William L. 2004. Can God Be Free? Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.

Speaks, Jeff. 2017. “Permissible Tinkering with the Concept of God”. Topoi 36: 587–97. doi:10.1007/s11245–016–9387-y.

Streumer, Bart. 2017. Unbelievable Errors: An Error Theory About All Normative Judgements. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.

Swinburne, Richard. 1979. The Existence of God. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.

Väyrynen, Pekka. 2017. “The Supervenience Challenge to Non-Naturalism”. In The Routledge Handbook to Metaethics, edited by Tristram McPherson and David Plunkett, 170–84. New York: Routledge.

Wielenberg, Erik J. 2005. Value and Virtue in a Godless Universe. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.

Zagzebski, Linda Trinkaus. 2004. Divine Motivation Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.

Published

2022-01-28

How to Cite

Lambert, St.John. 2022. “Is Theism Compatible With Moral Error Theory?”. European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 14 (3):1-20. https://doi.org/10.24204/ejpr.2022.3485.

Issue

Section

Research Articles