Euteleology Meets/Needs Idealism

Authors

  • Thomas Schärtl Univ. Regensburg

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24204/ejpr.v11i1.2725

Abstract

The paper compares the non-standard theistic notion of God as presented by John Bishop and Ken Perszyk in their so-called “euteleological” concept of God with idealistic, especially Hegelian and post-Hegelian, concepts of the divine. Both frameworks not only share striking similarities, based on their guiding intuitions, but also have remarkably parallel problems that have already been discussed in 19th-century speculative German theology in the aftermath of German Idealism. The article offers some proposals to strengthen the euteleological concept of God metaphysically — based on some insights coming from post-Hegelian discussions.

References

Bishop, John. 2007. “How a Modest Fideism may Constrain Theistic Commitments: Exploring an Alternative to Classical Theism”. Philosophia 35, no. 3–4: 387–402. doi:10.1007/s11406–007–9071-y.

— . 2009. “Towards a Religiously Adequate Alternative to OmniGod Theism”. Sophia 48, no. 4: 419–33. doi:10.1007/s11841–009–0130–7.Bishop, John, and Ken Perszyk. 2011. “The Normatively Relativised Logical Argument from Evil”. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 70, no. 2: 109–26. doi:10.1007/s11153–010–9282–1.

— . 2014. “Divine Action Beyond the Personal OmniGod”. In Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Religion Volume 5, edited by Jonathan Kvanvig, 1–21. Oxford Univ. Press.

— . 2016. “A Euteleological Conception of Divinity and Divine Agency”. In Rethinking the Concept of a Personal God: Classical Theism, Personal Theism, and Alternative Concepts of God, edited by Thomas Schärtl, Christian Tapp and Veronika Wegener, 211–25. Münster: Aschendorff Verlag.

— . 2016. “Concepts of God and Problems of Evil”. In Alternative Concepts of God: Essays on the Metaphysics of the Divine, edited by Andrei A. Buckareff and Yujin Nagasawa, 106–27. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.

— . 2017. “The Divine Attributes and Non-personal Conceptions of God”. Topoi 36, no. 4: 609–21. doi:10.1007/ s11245–016–9394-z.

Buckareff, Andrei A., and Yujin Nagasawa, eds. 2016. Alternative Concepts of God: Essays on the Metaphysics of the Divine. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.

— . 2016. “Introduction: Alternative Conceptions of Divinity and Contemporary Analytic Philosophy of Religion”. In Alternative Concepts of God: Essays on the Metaphysics of the Divine, edited by Andrei A. Buckareff and Yujin Nagasawa, 1–18. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.

Fichte, Imanuel H. 1855. Die Idee der Persönlichkeit und der individuellen Fortdauer. Leipzig: Dyk’sche Buchhandlung.

Göschel, Carl F. 1829. Aphorismen über Nichtwissen und absolutes Wissen im Verhältnisse zur christlichen Glaubenserkenntniß: Ein Beytrag zum Verständnisse der Philosophie unserer Zeit. Berlin: E. Franklin.

— . 1838. Beiträge zur spekulativen Philosophie von Gott und dem Menschen und vom dem Gott-Menschen. Berlin: Duncker und Humblot.

Hegel, Georg W. F. 1994. Vorlesungen über die Philosophie der Religion: Teil 2: Die bestimmte Religion [1824]. Edited by Walter Jaeschke. Hamburg: Meiner.

— . 1995. Vorlesungen über die Philosophie der Religion: Teil 3: Die vollendete Religion [1824]. Edited by Walter Jaeschke. Vorlesungen ausgewählte Nachschriften und Manuskripte; 5. Hamburg: Meiner.

Jaeschke, Walter. 1986. Die Vernunft in der Religion: Studien zur Grundlegung der Religionsphilosophie Hegels. Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog.

McCord Adams, Marilyn. 2016. “Horrors: To What End?”. In Alternative Concepts of God: Essays on the Metaphysics of the Divine, edited by Andrei A. Buckareff and Yujin Nagasawa, 128–44. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.

Michelet, Carl L. 1838. Geschichte der letzten Systeme der Philosophie in Deutschland von Kant bis Hegel: Teil 2. Berlin: Duncker und Humblot.

Schärtl, Thomas, Christian Tapp, and Veronika Wegener, eds. 2016. Rethinking the Concept of a Personal God: Classical Theism, Personal Theism, and Alternative Concepts of God. Münster: Aschendorff Verlag.

Downloads

Published

2019-03-17

How to Cite

Schärtl, Thomas. 2019. “Euteleology Meets Needs Idealism”. European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 11 (1):83-116. https://doi.org/10.24204/ejpr.v11i1.2725.

Issue

Section

Research Articles