Is There a Dilemma for First-Order Supernaturalist Belief?

Geivett, R. Douglas. “The Evidential Value of Miracles.” In In Defense of Miracles: A Comprehensive Case for God’s Action in History, edited by R. Douglas Geivett and Gary R. Habermas, 178–95. Downers Grove, Ill.: InterVarsity Press, 1997.

Geivett, R. Douglas. “The Evidential Value of Religious Experience.” In The Rationality of Theism. Edited by Paul Copan and Paul Moser, 175–203. London: Routledge, 2003.

Geivett, R. Douglas. “Hume and a Cumulative Case Argument.” In In defense of natural theology: A post-Humean assessment. Edited by James F. Sennett and Douglas R. Groothuis, 297–329. Downers Grove, Ill.: InterVarsity Press, 2005.

Geivett, R. Douglas. “Miracles [Addendum].” In Encyclopedia of philosophy. Vol. 6. Edited by Donald M. Borchert. 2. edition. 10 vols., 274–76. Detroit: Macmillan Reference USA, 2006.

Geivett, R. Douglas. “Neither Secular Nor Religious? The Paradox of Pluralism and the Problem of Religious Knowledge.”, unpublished manuscript, presented at the V Congreso Mundial y Asamblea General de la COMIUCAP, Universidad de Santo Tomás, Bogotá D.C., Colombia, July 8, 2017.

Geivett, R. D. and Brendan Sweetman, eds. Contemporary Perspectives on Religious Epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992.

Hick, John. An Interpretation of Religion: Human Responses to the Transcendent. Houndmills: MacMillan, 1989.

Hume, David. An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding. ed. by Peter Millican Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, [1748] 2007.

Moser, Paul K. The Elusive God: Reorienting religious epistemology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.

———. The Evidence for God: Religious knowledge reexamined. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.

Salamon, Janusz. “Atheism and Agatheism in the Global Ethic Discourse: Reply to Millican and Thornhill-Miller.” European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 7, no. 4 (2015): 197–245. doi:10.24204/ejpr.v7i4.94.

Thornhill-Miller, Branden, and Peter Millican. “The Common-Core/Diversity Dilemma: Revisions of Humean thought, New Empirical Research, and the Limits of Rational Religious Belief.” European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 7, no. 1 (2015): 1–49. doi:10.24204/ejpr.v7i1.128.