Jamesian Finite Theism and the Problems of Suffering
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24204/ejpr.v10i4.1966Keywords:
William James, theism, problem of evil, finite theism, pragmatismAbstract
William James advocated a form of finite theism, motivated by epistemological and moral concerns with scholastic theism and pantheism. In this article, I elaborate James’s case for finite theism and his strategy for dealing with these concerns, which I dub the problems of suffering. I contend that James is at the very least implicitly aware that the problem of suffering is not so much one generic problem but a family of related problems. I argue that one of James’s great contributions to philosophical theism is his advocacy for the view that adequate theistic philosophizing is not so much about cracking this family of problems, but finding a version of the problem to embrace.
References
Adams, Marilyn McCord. 1999. Horrendous Evils and the Goodness of God. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Carpenter, Frederic I. 1929. “Points of Comparison between Emerson and James”. The New England Quarterly 2, no. 3: 458-74. doi:10.2307/359243.
Cooper, Wesley. 2002. The Unity of William James’s Thought. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.
Diller, Jeanine. 1999. “A proposal to change the tradition of perfect being theology”. Southwest Philosophy Review 15, no. 1: 233-40. doi:10.5840/swphilreview199915140.
Dilley, Frank B. 2000. “A Finite God Reconsidered”. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 47, no. 1: 29-41. doi:10.1023/A:1003838717365.
Evans, C. Stephen, & R. Zachary Manis. 2009. Philosophy of Religion: Thinking about Faith. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press.
Funkenstein, Amos. 1994. “The Polytheism of William James”. Journal of the History of Ideas 55, no. 1: 99-111. doi:10.2307/2709955.
Gale, Richard M. 1999. The Divided Self of William James. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Griffin, David Ray. 1991. God, Power, and Evil: A Process Theodicy. New York, NY: University Press of America.
Hall, Richard A.S. 2009. “The Polytheism of William James”. The Pluralist 4, no. 1: 18-32. doi:10.1353/plu.0.0009.
Hartshorne, Charles, and William Reese. 2000. Philosophers Speak of God. Amherst, NY: Humanity Books.
James, William. 1975. Pragmatism and the Meaning of Truth, Edited by Burkhardt, Bowers, and Skrupskelis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
James, William. 1976. Essays in Radical Empiricism, Edited by Burkhardt, Bowers, and Skrupskelis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
James, William. 1977. A Pluralistic Universe, Edited by Burkhardt, Bowers, and Skrupskelis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
James, William. 1979. The Will to Believe, Edited by Burkhardt, Bowers, and Skrupskelis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
James, William. 1985. The Varieties of Religious Experience: A Study in Human Nature, Edited by Burkhardt, Bowers, and Skrupskelis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Levine, Michael P. 1994. “Pantheism, Theism and the Problem of Evil”. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 35, no. 3: 129-151. doi:10.1007/BF01538955.
Mackie, J.L. 1955. “Evil and Omnipotence”. Mind 64, no. 254: 200-12. doi:10.1093/mind/LXIV.254.200.
McCloskey, H.J. 1974. God and Evil. The Hague: Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff.
Moore, Jared S. 1913. “The Religious Significance of the Philosophy of William James”. The Sewanee Review 21, no. 1: 41-58. http://www.jstor.org.proxy.libraries.uc.edu/stable/2753258
Myers, Gerald E. 1986. William James: His Life and Thought. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Plantinga, Alvin. 1974. The Nature of Necessity. Oxford: Clarendon University Press.
Proudfoot, Wayne. 2000 “William James on an Unseen Order”. The Harvard Theological Review 93, no. 1: 51-66. http://www.jstor.org.proxy.libraries.uc.edu/stable/1510193
Seigfried, Charlene Haddock. 1990. William James’s Radical Reconstruction of Philosophy. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Sprigge, T.L.S. 1993. James and Bradley: American Truth and British Reality. Chicago, IL: Open Court Publishing Company.
