Moderate Inclusivism and the Conversational Translation Proviso: Revising Habermas' Ethics of Citizenship
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24204/ejpr.v11i4.2829Keywords:
Habermas, Religion in the Public Sphere, The Ethics of Citizenship, Deliberative democracyAbstract
Habermas’ ‘ethics of citizenship’ raises a number of relevant concerns about the dangers of a secularistic exclusion of religious contributions to public deliberation, on the one hand, and the dangers of religious conflict and sectarianism in politics, on the other. Agreeing largely with these concerns, the paper identities four problems with Habermas’ approach, and attempts to overcome them: (a) the full exclusion of religious reasons from parliamentary debate; (b) the full inclusion of religious reasons in the informal public sphere; (c) the philosophical distinction between secular and religious reasons; and (d) the sociological distinction between ‘Western’ and ‘non-Western’ religions. The result is a revised version of the ethics of citizenship, which I call moderate inclusivism. Most notably, moderate inclusivism implies a replacement of Habermas’ ‘institutional translation proviso’ with a more flexible ‘conversational translation proviso’.
References
Al-Qaradawi, Yusuf. 1994. The Lawful and the Prohibited in Islam. Indiana: American Trust Publications.
Audard, Catherine. 2011. “Rawls and Habermas on the Place of Religion in the Political Domain”. In Rawls and Habermas: Disputing the Political, edited by James G. Finlayson and Fabien Freyenhagen, 224–46. London: Routledge.
Audi, Robert. 1997. “Wolterstorff on Religion, Politics, and the Liberal State”. In Religion in the Public Square, edited by Robert Audi and Nicholas Wolterstorff. London: Rowman & Littlefield.
Audi, Robert, and Nicholas Wolterstorff, eds. 1997. Religion in the Public Square. London: Rowman & Littlefield.
Boettcher, James W. 2009. “Habermas, Religion and the Ethics of Citizenship”. Philosophy and Social Criticism 35, no. 1–2: 215–38. doi:10.1177/0191453708098761.
Calhoun, Craig. 2011. “Secularism, Citizenship, and the Public Sphere”. In Rethinking Secularism, edited by Craig Calhoun, Jonathan VanAntwerpen and Mark Juergensmeyer, 75–91. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.
Calhoun, Craig, Eduardo Mendieta, and Jonathan VanAntwerpen, eds. 2013. Habermas and Religion. Hoboken: Wiley.
Chambers, Simone. 2007. “How Religion Speaks to the Agnostic: Habermas on the Persistent Value of Religion”. Constellations 14, no. 2: 210–23.
—. 2010. “Secularism Minus Exclusion: Developing a Religious Friendly Idea of Public Reason”. The Good Society 19, no. 2: 16–21.
Cooke, Maeve. 2007. “A Secular State for a Postsecular Society? Postmetaphysical Political Theory and the Place of Religion”. Constellations 14, no. 2: 224–38.
Eberle, Christopher J. 2002. Religious Conviction in Liberal Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
Forst, Rainer. 2011. The Right to Justification. New York, NY: Columbia Univ. Press.
Habermas, Jürgen. 1996. Between Facts and Norms. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
—. 2003. “Citizenship and National Identity”. In The Condition of Citizenship, edited by Bart van Steenbergen. London: Sage Publications.
—. 2003. The Future of Human Nature. Cambridge: Polity Press.
—. 2006. “Political Communication in Media Society: Does Democracy Still Enjoy an Epistemic Dimension? The Impact of Normative Theory on Empirical Research”. Communication Theory 16, no. 4: 411–26.
—. 2008. Between Naturalism and Religion. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
—. 2008. “Die Dialektik der Säkularisierung”. Blätter für deutsche und internationale Politik 53, no. 4: 33–46.
—. 2008. “Notes on Post-Secular Society”. New Perspectives Quarterly 25, no. 4: 17–29. doi:10.1111/j.1540–5842.2008.01017.x.
—. 2012. Nachmetaphysiches Denken. Berlin: Suhrkamp Verlag.
—. 2013. “Reply to my Critics”. In Habermas and Religion, edited by Craig Calhoun, Eduardo Mendieta and Jonathan VanAntwerpen, 347–90. Hoboken: Wiley.
Habermas, Jürgen, and Charles Taylor. 2011. “Dialogue”. In The Power of Religion in the Public Sphere, edited by Eduardo Mendieta and Jonathan VanAntwerpen, 60–69. New York, NY: Columbia Univ. Press.
Holst, Cathrine, and Anders Molander. 2015. “Jürgen Habermas on Public Reason and Religion: Do Religious Citizens Suffer an Asymmetrical Cognitive Burden, and Should They be Compensated?”. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 18, no. 5: 547–63.
Jakobsen, Jonas. 2015. “Secularism, Liberal Democracy, and Islam in Europe: A Habermasian Critique of Talal Asad”. Contrastes 20, no. 3: 113–125. doi:10.24310/Contrastescontrastes.v20i3.2419.
—. “The Claims of Freedom: Habermas’s Deliberative Multiculturalism and the Right to Free Speech”. Doctoral Thesis, UiT — The Arctic Univ. of Norway.
Jakobsen, Jonas; Fjørtoft, Kjersti. 2018. “In Defense of Moderate Inclusivism: Revisiting Rawls and Habermas on Religion in the Public Sphere”, in Etikk i praksis — Nordic Journal of Applied Ethics 12, no. 2: 143–157. doi:10.5324/eip.v12i2.2267.
Jansen, Yolande. 2011. “Postsecularism, piety and fanaticism: Reflections on Jürgen Habermas’s and Saba Mahmood’s critiques of secularism”. Philosophy and Social Criticism 37, no. 9: 977–98.
Jensen, Mark. 2005. “The Integralist Objection to Political Liberalism”. Social Theory and Practice 31, no. 2: 162–81.
Laborde, Cécile. 2017. Liberalism’s Religion. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.
Lafont, Cristina. 2013. “Religion in the Public Sphere: What are the Deliberative Requirements of Democratic Citizenship?”. In Habermas and Religion, edited by Craig Calhoun, Eduardo Mendieta and Jonathan VanAntwerpen, 230–48. Hoboken: Wiley.
March, Andrew. 2013. “Rethinking Religious Reasons in Public Justification”. American Political Science Review 107, no. 3: 523–39.
Mavieli, Luca. 2012. Europe’s Encounter with Islam: The Secular and the Postsecular. London: Routledge.
McCarthy, Thomas. 2013. “The Burdens of Modernized Faith and Postmetaphysical Reason in Habermas’s ‘Unfinished Project of Modernity’”. In Habermas and Religion, edited by Craig Calhoun, Eduardo Mendieta and Jonathan VanAntwerpen, 115–31. Hoboken: Wiley.
Mendieta, Eduardo, and Jonathan VanAntwerpen, eds. 2011. The Power of Religion in the Public Sphere. New York, NY: Columbia Univ. Press.
Neal, Patrick. 2014. “Habermas, Religion, and Citizenship”. Politics and Religion 7, no. 2.
Nussbaum, Martha. 2012. The New Religious Intolerance: Overcoming the Politics of Fear in an Anxious Age. Cambridge: The Belknap Press.
Rawls, John. 2005. Political Liberalism. New York, NY: Columbia Univ. Press.
Taylor, Charles. 2011. “Why We Need a Radical Redefinition of Secularism”. In The Power of Religion in the Public Sphere, edited by Eduardo Mendieta and Jonathan VanAntwerpen, 34–59. New York, NY: Columbia Univ. Press.
Thomassen, Lasse. 2006. “Inclusion of the Other? Habermas and the Paradox of Tolerance”. Political Theory 34, no. 4: 439–62.
Waldron, Jeremy. 2012. “Two-Way Translation: The Ethics of Engaging with Religious Contributions in Public Deliberation”. Mercer Law Review 63, no. 3: 845–68.
Wolterstorff, Nicholas. 1997. “The Role of Religion in Decision and Discussion of Political Issues”. In Religion in the Public Square, edited by Robert Audi and Nicholas Wolterstorff. London: Rowman & Littlefield.
Yates, Melissa. 2007. “Rawls and Habermas on Religion in the Public Sphere”. Philosophy and Social Criticism 33, no. 7: 880–91.
